CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Race, body mass index and breastfeeding outcomes among black and white mothers

Author: 
Tonitrice Wicks, Hamed Benghuzzi, Michelle Tucci and Elgenaid Hamadain
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

The purpose of this study is to examine the association between race, body mass index and breastfeeding outcomes among black and white women in Mississippi. A secondary analysis from of the 2009 – 2011 Mississippi Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System was conducted. Multivariable hazard ratios were investigated to assess the relationship between marital status and breastfeeding duration at 8 weeks postpartum. Stratified analyses were performed for white and black women. In terms of breastfeeding initiation and race, black women (63.1%) had a higher percentage of not initiating breastfeeding than white women (36.6%). The Chi-Square results, χ²(1) = 105.872 (p<0.001), indicating that there was a statistically significant association between race and breastfeeding initiation. Overall, both black and white women included in the study breastfed for approximately 3.08 weeks postpartum. Black women breastfeed for an average of 2.61 weeks compared to white women who breastfed for 3.62 week. At 8 weeks postpartum, the estimated probability of breastfeeding among white mothers was statistically different than white women. For body mass index, the results showed that there was no statistically significant association between BMI and breastfeeding initiation (p = 0.122). The Kaplan Meier analysis indicated that at 8 weeks postpartum, there was a statistically significant difference in breastfeeding duration within the BMI groups. However, after adjusting for confounding factors using the Cox regression the results indicated that BMI was not a predictor for breastfeeding duration. The results obtained from this study showed that 18.4%, 29.3%, 27.9%, and 25.7% of women underweight, obese, overweight, and normal BMI group, respectively, were breastfeeding at 8 weeks. There was a statistically significant difference between the BMI groups in breastfeeding duration (p<0/05). The survival curve showed that the probability of continuing breastfeeding was lower for underweight women than all of the other age groups at all time points. The overall average of weeks in which mothers continued to breastfeed for each corresponding age group was 3.094 weeks followed by 2.36, 3.19, 3.15, and 3.05; respectively for each BMI category. The results for BMI showed that the breastfeeding rate at 8 weeks postpartum was statistically different among each weight group (p<0.005). After adjusting for the following covariates: race, age, education, income, marital status, prenatal education, WIC participation and postpartum education (Cox Regression), the results showed that women were no more likely to continue breastfeeding at 8 weeks based on BMI (underweight, normal, overweight and obese).

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran