CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

The technical analysis and comparison of the male athletes that are competing at the 21st and 22nd international nazim canca judo cup competitions

Author: 
Nuri Muhammet Çelik, Mehmet Soyal and Cengiz Taşkın
Subject Area: 
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Abstract: 

The purpose of the study: The comparison of years 2014 and 2015 as a result of technical criteria determined by performance and technical analysis of the men’s national under 21 team aged between 15 and 17 that competes in the 21st and 22nd International Nazım Canca European Judo Cup Under 21 Competition in Antalya, 2014 and 2015 . For this study, the total of 352 judo contests in the 21st and 22nd International Nazım Canca Tournament have been saved to the camera and then the video analysis of the competitions have been performed. Points of Turkey men’s national under 21 team racing in the tournament from all of the technical classes and also the points that are lost from the same technical classes have been saved to the computer environment as an excel file then runned to a custom table test in spss and analyzed. In addition, standing techniques (tachi-waza) and ground techniques (ne-waza) also have been shown in the excel tables. In the 21st Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, Turkey men’s under 21 team, with 66 people attended, made a total of 167 matches and achieved 80 wins and 87 defeats.Then in the 22nd Nazım Canca Judo Under 21 Tournament, Turkey men’s under 21 team, with 71 people attended, made a total of 185 matches and achieved 90 wins and 95 defeats. As a result of the technical analysis and examination; Turkey men’s under 21 team in the 21st Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, has made 8 ippon, 14 waza-ari and 19 yuko pointsfrom the Tachi-waza (standing techniques) technical class; thenin the 22nd Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, has made 20 ippon, 20 waza-ari and 28 yuko points from the same technical class. Considering the total of all points, %65 significant increase and success were observed. Also in the 21st Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, the total of 37 ippon, 38 waza-ari and 32 yuko points have been lost from theTachi-waza (ground techniques) technical class, whereas in the 22nd Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, 35 ippon, 38 waza-ari and 32 yuko points have been lost.A %8.5 significant decrease in the values was observed when looking at the points that have been lost. Then again as a result of examination: In the 21st Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, Turkey men’s national team has won only 2 matches and lost 17 matches from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class, Successful matches, has been won by using Osea-Komi-Waza techniques from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class. In the 21st Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, Turkey men’s under 21 team couldn’t win any match with Shime-waza and Kansetsu-waza techniques from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class. In the 21st Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, Matches that have been lost are 4 of them in Kansetsu-Waza techniques and 13 of them in Osea-Komi-Waza techniques from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class. On the contrary, as a result of examination: In the 22nd Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, Turkey men’s under 21 team, with 9 wins from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class,has shown a significant increase as winning five times greater compared to the previous year. At the same time, Turkey men’s national team that has lost 12 matches from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class, has shown %30 significant and successful decrease compared to the lost matches. Also; in the 22nd Nazım Canca Judo Tournament, Turkey men’s under 21 team with the total of 9 wins, has won 2 of them in Shime-Waza techniques,1 of them in Kansetsu-Waza techniques and 6 of them in Osea-Komi-Waza techniques, from Ne-Waza (ground techniques) technical class.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran