CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation with lignocaine and nalbuphine: a comparative study

Author: 
Kusum Bisla, Sarla Hooda, Suman Bisla, Vishakha Dhasmana and Monika Dalal
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Previous studies done on Lignocaine and Nalbuphine individually found to attenuate the haemodynamic stress response but none of the study compared the two drugs. To compare the efficacy of intravenous Lignocaine versus intravenous Nalbuphine for attenuating the stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Material and method: The present study was a hospital based prospective, randomized study conducted amongst adults aged 20 years to 60 years who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia in the Department Of Anaesthesiology And CriticalCare. The patients were randomly allocated to GROUP L (n = 30) Patients received intravenous lignocaine 1.5 mg kg-1 ninety seconds before tracheal intubation and GROUP N (n =30) received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg kg-1 one hundred and twenty seconds before tracheal intubation. Results: All the patients were monitored for heart rate, blood pressure(systolic, diastolic and mean BP) for haemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation or side effects in the postoperative period. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups with regards to mean age and gender. The attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation was significantly better with nalbuphine as compared to lignocaine.There was no side effect in both the groups. Conclusion: It is safe to assume that the dosage of 0.2 mg/kg of Nalbuphine is better at the attenuation of haemodynamic pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation than Lignocaine 1.5 mg kg -1.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran