CALL FOR PAPERS

CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2018

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

Comparing mandibular, 2implant supported overdenture and conventional mandibular complete denture on the basis of patient compliance and cost factor: A systematic review

Author: 
Onkar Jabade, Dr. Dilip Kakade, Dr. Nayana Anasane and Dr. Riddhi Kulkarni
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Change is inevitable. Considering the technological advancements taking place in dentistry, sticking to age old concept of conventional complete denture is regressive, which deprives patients of better prosthetic options. The transition from natural teeth to prosthesis is most comfortable to patient if replaced by full fixed implant prosthesis. However, such a prosthesis is not feasible in all cases due to anatomical, financial or other restrictions. In such cases, giving a 2 implant supported mandibular overdenture gives multifold advantages over the conventional complete dentures and strikes a golden balance with respect to patient compliance and cost factor. Aim: To compare compliance and cost factor in patients using two implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional mandibular complete dentures Study design and Method: The following criteria were used to select the studies on the patient compliance in patients using mandibular 2 implant supported overdentures and conventional mandibular complete dentures. The inclusion criteria were articles in English or those having detailed summary in English, studies that provide randomized controlled trials and articles on cost comparison between the two modalities. Studies that were published between 1st January 1995 to 31st December 2015 were included. Results: Various electronic databases were searched using different search strategies from the above mentioned key words and the combinations. The number of articles identified through the database searching were 330 in all. After thorough reading of titles the number of titles found relevant were 200. Further these records were assessed for any duplicates and100 duplicate articles were removed while including 30 articles. Full text thorough reading of these articles was done and were assessed for eligibility. Only ten articles were qualified and other articles were excluded. Conclusions: The evidence currently available suggests that the restoration of the edentulous mandible, with a conventional denture is no longer the most appropriate first choice Prosthodontic treatment. There is now overwhelming evidence that a mandibular 2 implant supported overdenture should become the first choice of treatment for the edentulous mandible. Clinical implication: In the world of evidence based dentistry we are armed with lot of scientific backing for the above statement. Suggesting and convincing a patient for this modality should be top priority for Prosthodontist. Due to overwhelming evidence on mandibular 2 implant supported overdenture in the literature over conventional mandibular complete denture in respect to patient compliance and cost factors it should be made the first choice of treatment for completely edentulous patients.

PDF file: 

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

CURRENT ISSUE

NEWS

CHIEF EDITOR
Rosane Cavalcante Fragoso, Brasil
ASSOCIATE CHIEF EDITOR

   

Jean-Marc SABATIER
Chief Scientific Officer and Head of a Research Group
France

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

EDITORIAL BOARD

Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran