CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Effectiveness of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Steinernema tbilisiense and S. thesami against pest oak - Lymantria dispar (L.) and Tortrix viridana (L.)

Author: 
Oleg Gorgadze and Giorgi Bakhtadze
Subject Area: 
Life Sciences
Abstract: 

Steinernematids and Heterorhabditids are lethal insect pathogens with biocontrol potential for managing insect pests of agricultural importance.The efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) of Steinernema tbilisiense and S. thesami was evaluated by oak pests, such as Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Liparidae) and Tortrix viridanaL. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). To determine the efficacy of nematodes under laboratory conditions, suspensions of the following concentrations were tested: 700 nematode, 350 nematode, and 200 nematode in 1 ml of water. The experimental objects were mainly L. dispar and T. viridana. In those experiments, where a suspension of S. tbilisiense 700, 350 and 200 nematodes in 1 ml of water was used against L. dispar, 96.5, 62.0 and 55.0% insect mortality were respectively recorded. When applying S. thesami - 98.0; 71.0 and 57.5% deaths.During the action of S. tbilisiense on the caterpillars of T.viridana, 95.5, 58.0 and 53.0% died. When using S. thesami, respectively, 90.5., 66.0 and 56.0%.The most effective concentration was 700 nem. in 1 ml of water, in which a maximum biological efficiency (99-100%) was achieved in a number of replicates.When using combined suspensions of two species of S. tbilisiense and S. thesami nematodes (350 N each per 1 ml of water) caused the death of 98.0% of L. dispar caterpillars, while the effectiveness of S. tbilisiense alone was 62.0% and S. thesami - 71.0%.The same high efficacy was observed when using this suspension against T.viridana - 92.0%.Thus, in the joint application of two species of nematodes, higher results were obtained than when each nematode was used separately. From this, we can conclude that in this case there is a phenomenon of synergism.Field surveys were conducted in Saguramo, Lelubani, Tezami (Mtskheta district).Oak trees were treated with suspensions of S. tbilisiense and S. thesami (700 nematode in 1ml of water). The best results were obtained in the fight against caterpillars of III and IV stages (mortality 62.5 - 65.2%).It was found that when using S. tbilisiense at 19-220 and relative humidity of 75 to 81%, the mortality of caterpillars of III and IV ages was 59%. In case of S. thesami, the mortality of caterpillars reached 64.5%.With an increase in the dose of nematodes in a suspension of up to 1000 nematodes in 1 ml of water, the effectiveness of the preparation also increased accordingly.The mortality of caterpillars in the case of S. tbilisiense reached 74.2%; when using S. thesami - 76.5%.On the basis of the conducted studies, it was established that the nematodes S. tbilisiense and S. thesami used in our experiments are equally effective against leaf-eating pests of oak. The effectiveness of nematode preparations varies with the temperature and relative humidity of the air. The main condition for obtaining high effects is high air humidity (above 80%) and an increase in the concentration of nematode suspension. It is proved the mortality of insect increases with an increase in the concentration of up to 1000 nematode 1 ml of water.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran