CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

A relook on reports of studies and audits of puc certification through the concept of controllability”: An innovative approach

Author: 
Om Parkash Kapoor and Dr. Anil Chandhok
Subject Area: 
Social Sciences and Humanities
Abstract: 

Purpose: Govt. of India, Ministry of Roads Transport & Highways (MoRTH) ; established PUC (Pollution Under Control) centers in all states, under their I&M (Inspection & Maintenance) program following CMVRs (Central Motor Vehicles Rules) 1989, to test on-road vehicle’s tail pipe emissions and issue PUC certificate to a vehicle which complies with BS IV or BS VI emission standards. The purpose of PUC is to control vehicular air pollution. The PUC centre could not function appropriately and failed to control the vehicular air pollution as brought out by studies and audits during the intense literature review. Various studies and audit reports gave observations and non-conformities (NCs) to PUCcentre. Had those observations and NCs been separated into management and worker controllable, then those might have been dealt with appropriately so as to bring improvement in the PUC certification process and kept vehicular pollution under control. Air pollution is recognized as a pressing sustainability concern. Design/Methodology/approach: Use of Concept of controllability paves the way for data of non conformances reported by study reports or audits to be separated into management controllable and worker controllable for their implementation. Secondly using relative authority levels and reporting lines, the organization structure is formulated to make it useful for coordination of employees in the PUC activity. In the Organization, Manager in any activity or function is responsible to put controls on the activity to produce a product or service which must be meeting fitness for purpose. Meeting fitness for purpose constitutes (i) Meeting customer needs (ii) Protecting human safety and (iii) Protecting the environments. Findings: The key findings are that (i) 20 to 30 % of non conformities are worker controllable and (ii) 70 to 80 % are management controllable. (iii) Existing org structure needs breakthrough as it lacks in depicting the means to manage across it like relative authority levels. Originality Of the study: Application of this concept for separation of defects/NCs into management & worker controllable, bring out performance gaps challenging the manager for actions which leads to improvement of performance. This is the uniqueness of this study that performance gaps appear which can be worked out for their remedy. Significance of findings: Regional Transport Office (RTO) is the management for 70 to 80% of non conformances of PUC. Remedy of these certainly improves air pollution control process. Similarly PUC Operator owes 20 to 30 % of defects. Removal of these leads him to do right certification of vehicle emissions. This innovative approach, even if, applied today may put PUC on the path of continual improvement thus saving human lives and protecting the environment.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran