CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

A comparative study between single v/s double layered intestinal anastomosis

Author: 
Dr. Ankur Akela and Dr. Ravi-kant
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

BACKGROUND: Intestinal anastomosis is a common procedure both in elective emergency surgeries. The key to a successful anastomosis is the accurate reunion of two viable bowel ends with complete avoidance of tension. Double layer anastomosis incorporates a large amount of ischemic tissue into the suture line leading to tension and increased chance of leakage and luminal narrowing while a single layer anastomosis causes minimal damage to vascular plexus and bowel lumen. OBJECTIVES: To study advantages of single layer v/s double layer anastomosis. METHODS: The materials for the clinical study were collected from patients admitted to Indira Gandhi Institute Of Medical Sciences Patna. GROUP1-All single layer anastomosis was performed by using continuous synthetic absorbable monofilament 3-0 suture taking all layers of bowel wall except the mucosa in to the bite. GROUP2-All double layered anastomosis was performed using continuous silk 3-0 Lembert suture for outer layer and continuous running Vicryl 3-0 suture for inner layer. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included in the study. The average time taken for anastomosis was 9.12 min for single layer whereas for double layer it was 13.38 min. The mean time taken for return of bowel sounds for single layer anastomosis was 2.32 days whereas for double layer it was 3 days. The average duration of hospital stay was 5.9 days for single layer whereas for other group it was 7.29 days. CONCLUSION: Single layered extra mucosal anastomosis is much safer and cost effective than the conventional double layered method.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran