Aim: To evaluate the success rate of BCS implants and conventional implants in maxilla and mandible after extraction. Patients and Methods: A clinical study was conducted on the patients who wanted replacement of missing teeth with implants from the year 2015 to 2017. 20 patients are selected and distributed into Group A (10 pateints with Basal implants (BCS) and Group B (10 patients with conventional crestal implants). Results: bone level was good in basal implant group when compared to the conventional group. Also there was no need of bone augmentation procedures in basal implant group and stime taken for giving prosthesis is less in basal implant group. Conclusion: The technique of basal implantology solves all problems associated with conventional (crestal) implantology. It is a patient oriented therapy, which meets the demands of the patients ideally.
IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.
