CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

A study on comparison of nasal cpap vs nippv in preterm with respiratory distress syndrome as post extubation support

Author: 
Dr Pooja Yadav, Dr Vivek Arora and Dr Shivani Sharma
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Objective: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a useful method of respiratory support after extubation. However, some infants fail despite CPAP use and require reintubation. Recent evidence shows that synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may decrease extubation failure in preterm infants. Our aim was to evaluate whether NIPPV decreases extubation failure compared with CPAP in preterm with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) post extubation. Methods: Infants who were less than 37 weeks gestation ageor less than 1.8kg and who were mechanically ventilated for RDS in the first 7 days were extubated to either NIPPV or NCPAP afterextubation. The criteria for extubation were peak inspiratory pressure of ≤16 cm H2O, positive end expiratory pressure of ≤5 cm H2O, intermittent mandatory ventilation rate of 15 to 25, and fraction of inspired oxygen ≤0.30.Primary outcome was extubation failure and need for reintubation. Secondary outcomes included mean duration of non-invasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation after extubation, duration of hospital stay and mortality. Results: Seventeen (31.4%) of 54 infants required reintubation with the use of NIPPV versus 20(36.3%) of 55infants,with the use of CPAP (P=0.54). Themean duration of mechanical ventilation in NIPPV group was 1.63 days which was less than mean duration of mechanical ventilation of 1.96 days in CPAP group but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.147). Similarly mean duration of non-invasive ventilation in NIPPV group was 3.01 days which was less than mean duration of non-invasive ventilation of 3.01 days in CPAP group but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.081) . Six (11.1%) out of 54 patients in NIPPV died compared to 8 (14.54%) patients in CPAP group (p=0.58). There was no significant difference in duration of hospital stay (14.19 days in NIPPV group vs 14.96 days in CPAP group ; p=0.58). Conclusions: NIPPV did not decrease the rates of extubation failure after mechanical ventilation in preterm babies with RDS compared with NCPAP.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran