CALL FOR PAPERS

Author Information

CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

Life Sciences / Biology
Architecture / Building Management
Asian Studies
Business & Management
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Finance
Engineering / Acoustics
Environmental Science
Agricultural Sciences
Pharmaceutical Sciences
General Sciences
Materials Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
Nonlinear Science
Chaos & Dynamical Systems
Physics
Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

Open Access
Peer Reviewed
Rapid Publication
Life time hosting
Free promotion service
Free indexing service
More citations
Search engine friendly

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

In vitro comparison of cleaning ability of oneshape and waveone rotary systems

Author:

Dr. Siddhesh Bandekar, Dr. Ashish Medha, Dr. Suvarna Patil, Dr. Nikhil Sathawane and Dr. Anay Aurangabadkar

Subject Area:

Health Sciences

Abstract:

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate & compare cleaning ability of two different single file rotary files. Methods: 20 canals of 10 extracted molars were selected. After preparing an access cavity, K-file size #15 was introduced into the root canal and India ink was injected. Twenty samples were randomly divided in to experimental groups in group I (n=10), root canals were prepared with OneShape file; in group II (n=10), WaveOne were used for instrumentation. After clearing, the removal of India ink from cervical, middle, and apical thirds was scored. Results: Thus, clening ability in One shape group is better than group Wave one or the Scores for coronal, middle and apical third of root is better in One shape as compared to wave one (i.e. p<0.01) Conclusions: Cleaning efficiency of OneShape system is better than WaveOne system.

PDF file: